From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Feb 23 19: 0:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (rwcrmhc54.attbi.com [216.148.227.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D866937B416; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:00:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020224030011.MHGI1214.rwcrmhc54.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 03:00:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA81085; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:48:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:48:55 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Bruce Evans Cc: Julian Elischer , John Baldwin , Matthew Dillon , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for ucred In-Reply-To: <20020224082720.S30437-100000@gamplex.bde.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Do you have anything constructive to add? I want to simply rip out the zeroing stuff.. unconditionally. On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Here's my compromise patch: > > Gak. It's totally over-the-top-engineered. It's not as bad as the > committed version though (that version has a 20-line comment which > explains everything except _why_ it complicates things to optimize > DIAGNOSTIC code, and pointers to the comment from all the diagnostic > ifdefs...). > > Bruce > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message