From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 18:26:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D173816A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5936A43D1D for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:26:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from parv_fm@mailsent.net) Received: from moo.holy.cow ([69.160.71.102]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040324022645.BQCR2142.mta13.adelphia.net@moo.holy.cow>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:26:45 -0500 Received: by moo.holy.cow (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 79FCDA5AD; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:27:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:27:23 -0500 From: Parv To: Gerald Pfeifer Message-ID: <20040324022723.GA4544@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Gerald Pfeifer , Etienne Robillard , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway References: <200402271110.i1RBArT5061902@freefall.freebsd.org> <200402281119.11188.erob@videotron.ca> <20040321044639.GA86534@moo.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: Etienne Robillard cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ports/63427: [lang/gcc33] Disabling the Java frontend at compile time X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 02:26:48 -0000 in message , wrote Gerald Pfeifer thusly... > > On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Parv wrote: > > Would not placing the %%LIBJAVA%% suffix inside some of the gcj* > > binaries work? > > Yes, but in that case we should add a WITHOUT_JAVA knob which then > also implies WITHOUT_LIBJAVA. Right you are. Agree. Yup. > my main focus now is to get > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/gerald@freebsd.org.html > down to zero failures ... > Still, if someone provides a fully tested patch after the > currently remaining issues with the gcc3x ports have been > resolved, I'm definitely willing to strongly consider that patch. No problem; i will try to provide a patch after that. Though i always check the cvs logs, at least for gcc3x ports, please somebody remind me in case i forget when the time comes. - Parv --