From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 19 07:27:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4669BD42B for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B630F17CF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t7J7Rhfx063761; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 08:27:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Subject: Re: unbound setup questions To: Antoine Kallab , nightrecon@hotmail.com References: Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <55D42FEF.6030508@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 08:27:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:27:54 -0000 On 19/08/2015 07:49, Antoine Kallab wrote: >> The unbound that ships with the OS is really only designed to be a resolver >> for the local machine, at least as far as I know at this point in my meager >> research. If you need services more like you may have been accustomed to >> with Bind you may wish to take a look at the unbound in the ports tree: >> /usr/ports/dns/unound. > > Thanks mike, installing unbound from ports did the trick. I had no > idea that local_unbound and unbound were different, thanks for that. I'm running the base unbound as a resolver for my entire net with no problems. The only difference I can spot between Antoine's config and mine is that I have domain-insecure directives for my internal domains. -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1