From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 18:07:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21701065675 for ; Thu, 6 May 2010 18:07:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@dougbarton.us) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DF48FC1B for ; Thu, 6 May 2010 18:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19757 invoked by uid 399); 6 May 2010 18:07:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 6 May 2010 18:07:52 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4BE30577.9000503@dougbarton.us> Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 11:07:51 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au References: <20100506015854.GN1357@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> <4BE25E26.8020003@dougbarton.us> <20100506113633.GQ1357@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20100506113633.GQ1357@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: portmaster stopped finding dependent ports if non-standard PORTSDIR X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 18:07:53 -0000 On 05/06/10 04:36, John Marshall wrote: >> So a couple of questions. What does: >> make BEFOREPORTMK=bpm -f/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk -V PORTSDIR > > /build/ports > >> return? And do you have an actual /usr/ports directory on the box where >> PORTSDIR is supposed to be /build/ports? If the answer to the first > > No, but (as shown in my OP) /usr/ports is a softlink to /build/ports. Yeah, don't do this. :) If you already have the link you don't need to set PORTSDIR (and in fact you shouldn't, it will create more problems than it solves, as you've seen). I haven't had my ports tree actually in /usr/ for years, but there is a link to the actual location which works just fine for all purposes. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/