From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 7 03:37:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9191A16A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 03:37:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3457E43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 03:37:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from khaled.abu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so1341000wra for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:37:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=DKvkYHFQcQsoyS24WN7AQWRKs/fFJu6WhJnOoZ9Wcy/RoLp0UGPfRT0Bnmk8qbLbaLhJOPH4r2zTXi/yQC437rmZ/7jRF9KcofTqRsaG+QCKXqIIsHzWHfETgjktVVcwupcpL2mFDgLJo1Z9b/SrjuFMdj0uGYF4xwsTgQX44lU= Received: by 10.54.81.3 with SMTP id e3mr29585wrb; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:37:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.23.34 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:37:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 05:37:12 +0200 From: abu khaled To: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 4.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: abu khaled List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 03:37:13 -0000 On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 21:19:35 -0600 (CST), Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, abu khaled wrote: > > > Alternatively, do not build the index your self (takes time) just fetch it: > > #cd /usr/ports > > #make fetchindex > > Ahem. You're replying to the person who _wrote_ the scripts that > automatically create those INDEX files that everyone is downloading, > you know :-) > > This particular message was generated automatically by that script and > is issued as a sanity check. Whenever it creates output, it means that > some committer has made a mistake. > > In summary, thanks for the help but this email is a feature, not a bug :-) > > mcl > > Oops... Thanks for the information and please forgive my ignorance.