From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 16 00:25:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5BB1065672 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C99B8FC17 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5561508A8; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:25:36 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iR9nGX7GsGLD; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:25:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-auth.unixathome.org (smtp-auth.unixathome.org [10.4.7.7]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDF5350842 ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:25:35 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4B79E5FE.7040200@langille.org> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:25:34 -0500 From: Dan Langille User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel O'Connor References: <4B7980E0.1020907@langille.org> <4B79B6BB.1060809@comcast.net> <201002161054.04696.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <201002161054.04696.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dan Naumov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Steve Polyack Subject: Re: hardware for home use large storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:25:37 -0000 Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Steve Polyack wrote: >> I'm not sure about that particular card, but we've never seen that >> great of performance out of the LSI MegaRAID cards that ship with >> Dell servers as the PERC. The newest incarnations are better, but I >> would try to get an Areca. The ones we have tested have displayed >> fantastic >> performance. They are fairly expensive in comparison, though. If >> you're using ZFS in place of the RAID on the LSI MegaRAID, I'd >> instead recommend other simpler SAS cards which are known to have >> good driver support. > > Why even bother with the LSI card at all? > That board already has 6 SATA slots - depends how many disks you want to > use of course. (5 HDs + 1 DVD drive?) Plus two SATA drives in a gmirror for the base OS, and one optical. I want a minimum of 8 slots.