From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 17 20:18:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 379A937B401; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7701443FAF; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h7I3IpuN002098;
	Sun, 17 Aug 2003 23:18:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 23:18:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030818003546.GA44401@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308172318170.29967-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: threads@freebsd.org
cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: First draft: rewrite of {get|set|swap}context(3)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 03:18:53 -0000

On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:34:21AM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think it should be UCF_NOSIGMASK. But for libkse, we really needn't
> > > > this kind of hack, because M:N thread in kernel always masks all signals,
> > > > you can always SIGFILLSET(&uc.uc_sigmask) before call set_context.
> > >
> > > I tried this, but it didn't fix mutex_d.
> > 
> > I can pass mutex_d if gettimeofday does not return -1, but it is strange
> > that gettimeofday can return -1 and errno is EFAULT.
> 
> The copyout() is probably failing or we're not restoring the
> return registers properly.
> 
> > so line 414 of mutex_d.c is asserted:
> >    assert (gettimeofday (&tv2, NULL) == 0);
> 
> Yup. That's what I'm seeing too. 

Hmm, that's not what I see.

-- 
Dan Eischen