From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 15 15:52:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA15704 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 15:52:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA15688; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 15:52:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA18481; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 23:49:45 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199710152249.XAA18481@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Brian Somers cc: stesin@gu.net, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New PPP? (Re: 8 days until 2.2.5... Administrative notices. In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Oct 1997 02:21:24 BST." <199710150121.CAA07608@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 23:49:45 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Oops, one last thing. I haven't merged the MSChap changes into ppp RELENG_2_2. It's definitely a new feature rather than a bug fix, but it's non-obtrusive given that you have to enable it. Should I merge this Jordan ? Would this hurt release ? > > BTW: how about the most modern PPP stuff (by Brian Somers) > > present in -current? will it be the part of 2.2.5? > > > > Best regards, > > Andrew Stesin > > The only things not in RELENG_2_2 are: > > 1. An MTU negotiation thing that makes ppp NAK the peers MRU if > you've "set mtu" in your config file. This is somewhat cosmetic > - I may merge it. > > 2. The LCP layers are not shut down correctly. This is apparant if > you run ppp -background. When ppp times out, it exits without > ever actually sending the TerminateReq to the other side. I'm > currently looking at bringing this into 2.2, pending a reply from > tom@tomqnx.com (Tom Torrance) confirming that his somewhat > obscure case is now behaving correctly. This has been tested > fairly extensively in -current over the past couple of weeks by > me (and hopefully some of the other committers - I followed up > the commit with a plea for testing - no news is good news). > > > nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE > > > > > > -- > Brian , , > > Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour.... > >