From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 28 02:22:58 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DECE61
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:22:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5928FC08
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:22:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
 id 7C07B56078; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:22:50 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:22:50 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs>
Subject: Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements
Message-ID: <20121228022250.GA9064@lonesome.com>
References: <20121225151532.GA1404@faust.sbb.rs>
 <CAFYkXjk8LgrYAm6iTtiAkrHKWcGDFij-7H9j1dgj305KemaOhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121226170233.GA1408@faust.sbb.rs>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121226170233.GA1408@faust.sbb.rs>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:22:58 -0000

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 06:02:33PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > Seeing 9.1-RELEASE instead 9.1-PRERELASE
> > or 9.1-RC4 is also a bad suprise for me...
> 
> I assume it does not look like release is the lack
> of packages.

What you are seeing is behind-the-scenes preparation.

The release is official when, and only when, a security-signed email is
sent to freebsd-announce@FreeBSD.org from the Release Engineering team.

mcl