From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Oct 9 11:56:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAE637B66C; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 11:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA04894; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 10:21:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.0/8.9.1) id e99ELw567010; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 10:21:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 10:21:58 -0400 (EDT) To: John Baldwin Cc: alpha@freebsd.org, Matthew Jacob Subject: RE: red face better... In-Reply-To: <200010090524.WAA03098@john.baldwin.cx> References: <14815.39431.983740.401656@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200010090524.WAA03098@john.baldwin.cx> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14817.54315.270991.35552@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org John Baldwin writes: > Hmm, so the softinterrupt handler is running, but it is > always running and returning w/o actually seeming to do > anything. :( 0x40 = bit 6 == SWI_CLOCK. Can you add in > another KTR tracepoint in the softinterrupt loop in to > show it calling each SWI handler? Also, are you getting > any clock interrupts at all, or is SWI_CLOCK not getting > cleared from spending somehow? (and/or is softclock > calling setsoftclock())? Excellent hint! Thank you! There was a typo in sys/alpha/alpha/ipl_funcs.c, so softclock was never running. I've just committed a fix. Now my AS500 and UP1000 boot. Woo-hoo! I still don't understand how things were working for you.. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message