From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 08:37:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6088277D for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com (mail-qa0-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7412211 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id cm18so4950210qab.0 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 01:37:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ehv1XduQ/DKH+hhJsDV8dEPJYEb6Zt0xBY8+vyqBeDA=; b=U07+WVEPVPso7c8MPxxOsw9GBgPTct1Yc3GbBBc/ammMpO0RX4mWdSC8lyHlYdCGP4 wNMzQ5Wn4zrcfwruU3VNmsYV1oQfIr+NLJQV6yajxtEvDUzUu9G2Ecx45lpkkvvnJjcw Z5n1YorLjxBRYx39lCkoIKYPcQFUEDBkpvnlGNqaZMGdICz97ankBMQRJX7i3UJ3I8NS ZcoJPTOdrtAedXW16/MQ08Tl6Z0+Y+s4oTj8S2wun+eKEn0O/BdxkXus4frRJ+0Le5EF ZZOMJeQh6kPZBOwMoNTPNTylRyxbIAJfpvin1OeGSw2hKnfwrmiLDdyv+PUsVSmIJ2ej mqAg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSbxz66yCNrqDgm92HnOkHOX1+kd8M9vQ2RiZbMEkohKzZrmlLPJwNw2TSvJ2r15c9UB2q MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.93.163 with SMTP id d32mr39682764qge.1.1403944631431; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 01:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.70.66 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 01:37:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [24.4.138.100] In-Reply-To: <20140628071735.GF34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <6ADBB2BF-C7E8-4050-9278-2565A63D2EA8@gluster.org> <20140627070411.GI24440@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140627223456.GD34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140628070433.GE34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140628071735.GF34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 01:37:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD support being added to GlusterFS From: Harshavardhana To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jordan Hubbard X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:37:18 -0000 > > it is better imho to uses the one we have in ports, has it receives the normal > maintainance and avoid having to do the job twice, and it is simpler has well as > that makes be not having to use autogen.sh but rather use regular macros to > regenerate the configure/Makefiles The tarball was provided only as a placeholder and its interim to run "./autogen.sh" it is not necessary on an official release which comprises of "./configure" . In-fact argp-standalone is the one tested and blessed (since one cannot guarantee what a FreeBSD port might diverge into) -- Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse regulation with outcomes