From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 28 09:15:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA09535 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 09:15:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA09530 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 09:15:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA09664 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 09:15:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199803281715.JAA09664@austin.polstra.com> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc in -current still broken In-Reply-To: <199803281608.IAA09302@austin.polstra.com> References: <199803281608.IAA09302@austin.polstra.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 09:15:02 -0800 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote: > > I think John's patch for `as' is sufficient, but haven't checked. > > I think so too. But I don't want to commit it until (a) somebody > has reviewed it, and (b) somebody has done a make world with it and > verified that things still seem to work after that. By the way, anybody who can do a make world can do step (b). I think the most thorough test would be to apply the patch, build and install the assembler, and then do the make world. That way, everything will be built using the new assembler. Then, build a few programs and make sure they work. Try some floating point tests. You get the idea. Waiting by the phone, :-) John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message