From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 1 15:09:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA9416A46E for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 15:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9019913C468 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 15:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2007 09:40:28 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id OCG93616; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 09:40:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2007 09:39:24 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18257.29275.300216.248920@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 09:40:27 -0500 To: David Southwell In-Reply-To: <200712010651.58455.david@vizion2000.net> References: <33640.194.74.82.3.1196149681.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org> <200712010308.43873.david@vizion2000.net> <20071201132251.GA20300@soaustin.net> <200712010651.58455.david@vizion2000.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: duration of the ports freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:09:03 -0000 David Southwell writes: > Before I do so let me step outsiide the freebsd environment and > ask what our comments would be if MS$ were to announce that they > were about to release an upgrade to their operating system and > until the new upgrade had been released upgrades to existing > applications would be barred. We don't know such delays /don't/ happen; all we know is they aren't announced. Robert Huff