From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 17 06:54:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41263342 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (gatekeeper.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 695792F01 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alph.d.allbsd.org (p4034-ipbf2106funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [114.148.167.34]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.allbsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8H6sHLt097619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:54:27 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.d.allbsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8H6sEQd047425; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:54:15 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:53:59 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20130917.155359.80913304344603571.hrs@allbsd.org> To: zeus@ibs.dn.ua Subject: Re: how are rc "collisions" solved? From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <20130917093450.20670@relay.ibs.dn.ua> References: <20130917093450.20670@relay.ibs.dn.ua> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_17_15_53_59_2013_401)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mail.allbsd.org [133.31.130.32]); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:54:27 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-92.3 required=13.0 tests=CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, ONLY1HOPDIRECT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,SAMEHELOBY2HOP,SPF_SOFTFAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on gatekeeper.allbsd.org Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:54:35 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_17_15_53_59_2013_401)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Zeus Panchenko" wrote in <20130917093450.20670@relay.ibs.dn.ua>: ze> hi, ze> ze> what will happen in case I have two contradictory scripts? ze> ze> lets say, script A defines daemon xxx start before daemon yyy and B ze> defines it around way ze> ze> how system will perform in this case? In that case circular dependency will be detected and a warning message will be displayed. Those scripts will be invoked in a deterministic order, however. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_17_15_53_59_2013_401)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlI3/IcACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1qIQCfbHGwg6KjBNx9cxiMf9rcuIOq 3lwAoJecG/XdDxBum++heSKJYIFtAMEN =iDGh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_17_15_53_59_2013_401)----