From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 06:17:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770C1106564A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 06:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from amailer.gwdg.de (amailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8992C8FC12 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 06:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wald.nfv.gwdg.de ([134.76.242.31] helo=pc028.nfv) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Yvy-0006tK-Pj for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:17:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA57D11.3020406@gwdg.de> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:17:53 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100929 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Subject: package generation on FreeBSD ftp server X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:17:34 -0000 I have a question about packages at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/ . They are automatically generated from time to time. I understand that this depends on computing capacities on the server farm etc. So some packages are relatively new, some are older and some are missing... For example, for math/saga there had been a package saga-2.0.4_4.tbz for some time. After updating SAGA GIS to version 2.0.5 there is no package any more. There was an error on building math/saga in first half of september, see http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?portname=saga This was corected and the new SAGA GIS version has to differentiate between i386 and amd64 because of dependency libiodbc (patch problem). Does this prevent from automatic package generation? I would be happy if someone could give an explaination on this. Thanks in advance, Rainer Hurling