From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 7 16:34:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011971065672 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outL.internet-mail-service.net (outl.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4808FC18 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A8BB98A9; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (home.elischer.org [216.240.48.38]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D46C2D601C; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ACCC30E.7080504@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:34:22 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rihad References: <4AC8A76B.3050502@mail.ru> <20091007085902.GA88982@lath.rinet.ru> <4ACC5E23.8090405@mail.ru> <20091007100503.GB88982@lath.rinet.ru> <4ACC6A7B.5050808@mail.ru> <20091007104525.GC88982@lath.rinet.ru> <4ACC7308.6070301@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <4ACC7308.6070301@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Oleg Bulyzhin Subject: Re: dummynet dropping too many packets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:34:20 -0000 rihad wrote: > Oleg Bulyzhin wrote: > You probably have some special sources of documentation ;-) According to > man ipfw, both "netgraph/ngtee" and "pipe" decide the fate of the packet > unless one_pass=0. Or do you mean sprinkling smart skiptos here and > there? ;-) > ngtee should not have any affect on the packet.. it takes a copy..