From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 17:57:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822CC16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44F243D2F for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:57:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) Received: from fwd01.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BIdNk-0006iY-01; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:57:00 +0200 Received: from fw.reifenberger.com (S8Ve1BZQweyw+JMOkqB-B5Mtq1a67I1LZhvs7qRQGTf4lozYar054q@[217.232.220.110]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1BIdNk-1NcoCm0; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:57:00 +0200 Received: from localhost (mike@localhost)i3S0us9k003918; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:56:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fw.reifenberger.com: mike owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:56:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Reifenberger To: Max Laier In-Reply-To: <200404272233.56765.max@love2party.net> Message-ID: <20040428024851.L3838@fw.reifenberger.com> References: <20040427025951.F756@fw.reifenberger.com> <200404272233.56765.max@love2party.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Seen: false X-ID: S8Ve1BZQweyw+JMOkqB-B5Mtq1a67I1LZhvs7qRQGTf4lozYar054q@t-dialin.net cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panics using pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:57:04 -0000 On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Max Laier wrote: > Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:33:49 +0000 > From: Max Laier > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Cc: Michael Reifenberger > Subject: Re: panics using pf > > On Tuesday 27 April 2004 01:04, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > > Hi, > > I get the attached panics after some time ( max. 1 hour )when using pf(4). > > I do not get them, when using ipf(4). > > > > Any clues? > > > #6 0xc0641d92 in nd6_slowtimo (ignored_arg=0x0) > > at ../../../netinet6/nd6.c:1800 > > nd6if = (struct nd_ifinfo *) 0xc43221c0 > > ifp = (struct ifnet *) 0xc4529c00 > > Okay ... this indicads that ifp->if_afdata[AF_INET6] is uninitialized, which > should not be the case when the slowtimo runs. As you told me off-list > (before I realized that you sent it to -current as well) this happens for the > pflog0 interface. Still that should not happen and I wonder if it's got to do > with the lately reported problems with a cleanup commit to nd6.c. > > So the question is, are you seeing this with nd6.c, rev. 1.42? Does upping to > 1.43 help? Does rolling back to April, 24th help? > > For the record, on my system (week-old -currnet) pflog0->if_afdata[AF_INET6] > if initialized okay. > I've seen panics with pf(4) for some weeks (see -current's archive for one report from me). But at that time I couldn't get a gdb backtrace because of a bug in the binutils... The last reports where with -current sources of that time. Should be the latest rev of nd6.c BTW: Disabling 'options INET6' fixes the panics as well as switching back to ipf(4), so I'm using pf(4) now since this morning... Bye/2 --- Michael Reifenberger, Business Development Manager SAP-Basis, Plaut Consulting Comp: Michael.Reifenberger@plaut.de | Priv: Michael@Reifenberger.com http://www.plaut.de | http://www.Reifenberger.com