From owner-freebsd-bugs  Thu Aug 24  6:14:30 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from info.iet.unipi.it (info.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.184])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3024637B423; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 06:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from luigi@localhost)
	by info.iet.unipi.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA32039;
	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 15:16:02 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from luigi)
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <200008241316.PAA32039@info.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: bin/18351: ipfw add with no rule number returns the wrong rule number
In-Reply-To: <200008241236.FAA06737@freefall.freebsd.org> from "johan@FreeBSD.org"
 at "Aug 24, 2000 05:36:59 am"
To: johan@FreeBSD.org
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 15:16:01 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: darcy@wavefire.com, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, luigi@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> Synopsis: ipfw add with no rule number returns the wrong rule number
...
> Alot has happened with ipfw in current and 4-Stable,
> do you know if this problem still exists in 4-Stable?

i think the problem still exists in 4.x.
But i want to look a bit at this patch, as i am uncertain on
what is the most appropriate place to assign rule numbers.

	cheers
	luigi



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message