From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 7 9:15:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from moo.sysabend.org (moo.sysabend.org [209.0.55.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABA837C095; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:15:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ragnar@sysabend.org) Received: by moo.sysabend.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 427817555; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:15:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moo.sysabend.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FC01D89; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:15:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:15:38 -0800 (PST) From: Jamie Bowden To: "David E. Cross" Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpc.lockd and xdr. In-Reply-To: <200003061712.MAA40849@cs.rpi.edu> Message-ID: Approved: yep X-representing: Only myself. X-badge: We don't need no stinking badges. X-obligatory-profanity: Fuck X-moo: Moo. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, David E. Cross wrote: :Version 2 of the lock manager is ready to be released. Amitha :says that it passes all of the tests in the suite posted by Drew (thanks :Drew). A noteable exception to this is on SGI where some lock requests :are never even received from the remote host. Also DOS sharing is not :yet complete. Any idea why this is? I only ask because: 12:12pm banshee /home/jamie %uname -aR IRIX64 banshee 6.5 6.5.5m 07151433 IP25 I have some PC's that I'm interested in putting FreeBSD on (other than my laptop) that would be on the network fulltime, and working NFS locking is really the only stumbling bock for me now. Jamie Bowden -- "Of course, that's sort of like asking how other than Marketing, Microsoft is different from any other software company..." Kenneth G. Cavness To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message