Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:38:44 -0200 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need help for DSDT for an Epox Amd64 MB Message-ID: <200601232038.44907.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <43D54F28.8080205@root.org> References: <200601201851.26858.joao@matik.com.br> <200601231909.02998.joao@matik.com.br> <43D54F28.8080205@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 23 January 2006 19:48, Nate Lawson wrote: > > well, would you mind saying which one exactly you think of for removing? > > Thinking of removing debug.acpi.disabled since it is mostly redundant > with the hint approach. But more investigation should be done before > claiming that. ok, means that all acpi subdrivers can not be disabled any more in boot.loa= der=20 and would be switched as hints on or off, right is this already possible, I mean disabling the acpi subsets as hints? let me ask what would be the advantage of using hints instead? Any timeline= =20 for this or just a thought at this time? thank's Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601232038.44907.joao>