From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 5 16:52:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA29593 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 16:52:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from xmission.xmission.com (softweyr@xmission.xmission.com [198.60.22.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA29567; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 16:52:30 -0800 (PST) Received: (from softweyr@localhost) by xmission.xmission.com (8.8.5/8.7.5) id RAA08170; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 17:51:55 -0700 (MST) From: Softweyr LLC Message-Id: <199702060051.RAA08170@xmission.xmission.com> Subject: Re: DEC 21040 v.s. DEC 21140 chip for ethernet cards To: jin@george.lbl.gov (Jin Guojun[ITG]) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 17:51:54 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, hardware@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199702051927.LAA24115@george.lbl.gov> from "Jin Guojun[ITG]" at Feb 5, 97 11:27:52 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Would someone please give me some information about the difference > between ethernet cards using DEC 21040 and DEC 21140 chips? > Is 21040 chip for 10BT and 21140 for 100 BT? Yes. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.com