Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:07:38 -0700 From: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jordan Hubbard <jordanhubbard@me.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD support being added to GlusterFS Message-ID: <CAAeUqd27Jb3oy5SGu3r_sQascu3z7mnNDEq=QsepXo2r1HTB=A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAAeUqd3%2Bm9A6SAtZF5VM2oLzuA9r_cR2p9sxfrsCdOcYXNM4dQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <C647EDA1-EA93-4A66-B59D-3B5F959DC0E0@gluster.org> <6ADBB2BF-C7E8-4050-9278-2565A63D2EA8@gluster.org> <20140627070411.GI24440@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <AB0CB58A-A93E-4DDA-8060-A2B183BBB6FD@turbofuzz.com> <20140627223456.GD34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <EF01BB42-EEBE-4F59-A066-5C18E3F1CAC6@me.com> <20140628070433.GE34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <CAAeUqd2KVEPnuvMS1X=OAWzBxft2ihyoOOHYgGPFdWFpod_OpQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140628071735.GF34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <CAAeUqd3%2Bm9A6SAtZF5VM2oLzuA9r_cR2p9sxfrsCdOcYXNM4dQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> it is not necessary on an official release which comprises of "./configure" . > > In-fact argp from ports is okay to use, but it would be less work to rely on argp-standalone provided by GlusterFS. If the reason to use 'argp' from port was related to ./autogen.sh - then in-fact its not necessary. As i explained earlier - it was our mistake to provide only 'git' tarball not the 'make dist' tarball. I have further changes pending on review upstream, once they are pushed - i will provide a new tarball - without the necessity for './autogen.sh' Thanks for testing this port. -- Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse regulation with outcomes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAeUqd27Jb3oy5SGu3r_sQascu3z7mnNDEq=QsepXo2r1HTB=A>