From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 16 15:08:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F77716A4CE; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:08:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [83.167.185.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA8843D31; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D652A65218; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 16:07:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 82274-01-2; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 16:07:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (66-117-149-249.rdsl.lmi.net [66.117.149.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19C165219; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 16:07:53 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8CADA616D; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:08:10 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Harti Brandt Message-ID: <20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org> References: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:08:22 -0000 On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > While there I would also remove everything from netnatm that is not needed > by NgATM. This is mainly the socket interface. I'm not aware of any > application that uses it. Any thoughts on this? Oh. Don't remove that. Userland PPP needs it. People who are using ADSL modems of any kind will still need it. Thanks, BMS