Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:52:37 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <XFMail.011026185237.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp1yjprgzu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27-Oct-01 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> My bad. C90 requires that time_t fit into a long according to >> Garrett. > > Maybe it does. Maybe it doesn't. Chapter and verse, please. > > All I have is the final draft of C99, and all it says about the width > of time_t is that it is an arithmetic type "capable of representing > times" (7.23.1). There is no mention at all of the word "long" in > section 7.23. I was merely bringing up teh point snice most everyone else seemed to just ignore it. There are several people on here with copies of C90, I'm sure one can pop up with what it says about time_t. > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011026185237.jhb>