From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 6 15:43:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0624A16A41C for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:43:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@essenz.com) Received: from beck.quonix.net (beck.quonix.net [146.145.66.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B4C43D48 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:43:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@essenz.com) Received: from beck.quonix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beck.quonix.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j66FgfJ7025011; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:42:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (essenz@localhost) by beck.quonix.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id j66FgfQl025008; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:42:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: beck.quonix.net: essenz owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:42:41 -0400 (EDT) From: John Von Essen X-X-Sender: essenz@beck.quonix.net To: Jett Tayer In-Reply-To: <52676.202.175.229.210.1120663380.squirrel@mail.angdatingdaan.org> Message-ID: <20050706113803.X24781@beck.quonix.net> References: <3b88b80a0507051933f4750f3@mail.gmail.com><06ef01c581f6$c54fb3c0$de0a0a0a@visionsix.com> <20050706105612.W22721@beck.quonix.net> <52676.202.175.229.210.1120663380.squirrel@mail.angdatingdaan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SpamAssassin-3.0.3-Score: -2.82/5.8 ALL_TRUSTED X-MimeDefang-2.51: beck.quonix.net X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 146.145.66.90 Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rndc reload and BIND9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:43:03 -0000 Even though it doesn't receive a notify, dont the slave zones do a refresh anyway every X number of seconds (where X is specified in the zone file). Also, we have to account for when we add a new domain/zone (which is often). We will have to modify the main config file on the slave and issue an rndc reload anyway. -John On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Jett Tayer wrote: > a master/slave relationship is better. and will only "zone transfer" what > has changed :) > > > > > > Following a post I had about BIND9, I need to verify a certain behavior > > with BIND9 and issuing a rndc reload. > > > > Instead, of having a master and slave, I am going to have two masters. One > > master is the real master, the other gets replicated via rsync. The main > > reason for this approach is to cut down on all the zone transfers (we > > have 12,000 domains). > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >