From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 27 22:30:19 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E4616A41F
	for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56F443D64
	for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBRMUIom065655
	for <freebsd-rc@freefall.freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:18 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBRMUIYc065653;
	Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:18 GMT
Message-Id: <200512272230.jBRMUIYc065653@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: conf/90863: [patch] 6.0 boot: name resolution broken for daemon
	startup
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
	<freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:19 -0000

The following reply was made to PR conf/90863; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, wollman@xyz.csail.mit.edu
Cc:  
Subject: Re: conf/90863: [patch] 6.0 boot: name resolution broken for daemon startup
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:29:05 -0200

 I think that named is not starting first and so I guess the rc start order =
 is=20
 wrong and not that named do not answer queries,=20
 
 I reported similar here:
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D86668
 
 also I believe that this touches the same problem that the timeout is too=20
 long, see this PR:
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dbin/62139
 (even if this is apearently to ssh related the problem is the sshd dns reso=
 lve=20
 timeout which is too long)
 
 In my opinion the rc order needs to be corrected and the resolv timeout nee=
 ds=20
 to be shorter and a proper error messages on startup would help to understa=
 nd=20
 the problem because hanging on
 
  starting sendmail .
 
 makes believe the problem is in sendmail configuration
 
 Jo=E3o
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
 Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br