From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep  7 15:19:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9FA7616A4CF; Tue,  7 Sep 2004 15:19:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 97F2643D48; Tue,  7 Sep 2004 15:19:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i87FJebZ032700;
	Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:19:40 GMT
	(envelope-from imp@repoman.freebsd.org)
Received: (from imp@localhost)
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i87FJe69032699;
	Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:19:40 GMT
	(envelope-from imp)
Message-Id: <200409071519.i87FJe69032699@repoman.freebsd.org>
From: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:19:40 +0000 (UTC)
To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Subject: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/share/mk bsd.subdir.mk
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 15:19:40 -0000

imp         2004-09-07 15:19:40 UTC

  FreeBSD src repository

  Modified files:
    .                    Makefile.inc1 
    share/mk             bsd.subdir.mk 
  Log:
  Although 'Unanimous Consent' appears to be a well defined and used in
  the US Senate, Canadian Parliament and Australian Senate, it was
  causing some confusion.  After some consultation with Mark Murray,
  change this to 'without objection' since often times a plain-speaking
  term is preferable to a regionally used term.
  
  Also, clarify that this procedure is to be used when for more mundane
  matters that need a sanity check, but don't need the whole, ponderous
  voting proceedure that more difficult issues require.  Core members
  that read email in any given 48 hour period are trusted enough to know
  the difference and to provide the sanity check as necessary.
  
  Reviewed by: markm
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.444     +9 -9      src/Makefile.inc1
  1.46      +2 -2      src/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk