From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 17:11:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988623A1ACD for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BL4DS0skPz473v; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 073HBSYt057128 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 20:11:31 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua 073HBSYt057128 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 073HBSRi057126; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 20:11:28 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 20:11:28 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Steve Wills Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SOL_LOCAL define Message-ID: <20200803171128.GV2551@kib.kiev.ua> References: <50992471-7f17-dcdf-949f-1b0512a9b84d@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50992471-7f17-dcdf-949f-1b0512a9b84d@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on tom.home X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BL4DS0skPz473v X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 17:11:36 -0000 On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 12:19:42PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: > Hi, > > I ran into a case where some code I was building expected SOL_LOCAL to be > defined since LOCAL_PEERCRED was defined. See: > > https://github.com/nanomsg/nng/pull/1272 > > for details. And looking at getpeereid.c: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libc/gen/getpeereid.c?view=markup#l50 > > I see: > > error = _getsockopt(s, 0, LOCAL_PEERCRED, &xuc, &xuclen); > > I wonder if something like a: > > #define SOL_LOCAL 0 > > in sys/sys/un.h and a change to the above to: > > error = _getsockopt(s, SOL_LOCAL, LOCAL_PEERCRED, &xuc, &xuclen); > > might be useful for compatibility and clarity? Any opinions? This is something added by MacOS X 10.8 it seems. I see no negative effects of the addition, so why not. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25933