From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 28 18:25:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9F5742 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@getmail.no) Received: from bouvier.getmail.no (bouvier.getmail.no [84.210.184.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AAD2D35 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCA5428FA for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:25:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.78 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.78 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_KHOP_THREADED=-0.01, T_NICE_REPLY_A=0.01, T_UNKNOWN_ORIGIN=0.01] autolearn=no Authentication-Results: bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=getmail.no Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id hZR2WRvFXv5F for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:25:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2E1428FB for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:25:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 bouvier.getmail.no 7B2E1428FB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=getmail.no; s=8A9C8B4C-D727-11E2-8095-B6466E6B3FA2; t=1377714335; bh=3lxr4Xnl8YWovbSrXfm6t+NXeBRJRMsuolbW/QShGSU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=r4BAE+YSoyrXcM4yg3pYhaqm2QaWcBKSMSwmMWtFBZNz5sK6w/iKt+gwElk4YhdFJ PFk3W3DVuDnStvmT5PBOwMi7xyPLDF7h72JmoTqvcs6tWWQvBnOGAvJjDKxx2glVEQ 4E+y7PAi59p3R4UY86fs8+JFHFbnwxxaHqmRtKHA= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 0CntE8L_vf2m for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:25:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kg-core1.kg4.no (cm-84.215.180.206.getinternet.no [84.215.180.206]) by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A258428FA for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:25:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:25:35 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2. Message-Id: <20130828202535.ace8f6c882e94f21f7509966@getmail.no> In-Reply-To: <521D7552.5080008@UToledo.edu> References: <521C9E85.4060801@UToledo.edu> <521D7552.5080008@UToledo.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:25:44 -0000 On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:58:10 -0400 Robert Burmeister wrote: > > As 64 bit platforms tend to have more RAM and use ZFS, Do you have any numbers for the "64 bit platforms tend to use ZFS"? If not, I will suggest that this is just a theory. FWIW, I haven't abandoned UFS on 64-bit platforms yet (I use ZFS were I need it). Oh, and all people - please trim your quotes. -- Torfinn Ingolfsen