From owner-freebsd-questions Tue May 21 10:56:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA13802 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 21 May 1996 10:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xenon.chromatic.com (xenon.chromatic.com [199.5.224.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA13785; Tue, 21 May 1996 10:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ohio.chromatic.com (ohio.chromatic.com [199.5.224.98]) by xenon.chromatic.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA14690; Tue, 21 May 1996 10:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from hua@localhost) by ohio.chromatic.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA00279; Tue, 21 May 1996 10:56:28 -0700 Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 10:56:28 -0700 From: Ernest Hua Message-Id: <199605211756.KAA00279@ohio.chromatic.com> To: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Endeavour 133Mhz+Adaptec 2940=cc1 got signal 11 Cc: hua@XENON.chromatic.com Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk We have many Endeavours and Endeavour-derived motherboards. We have suffered many bad cache problems, especially the 512K ones. If you are working at a company with a cache memory tester, USE IT!!! It will save you countless hours of frustration. We have had very high failure rates for caches shipped with Endeavours (but I doubt it is the fault of the motherboard). In fact, use those DRAM testers as well! Ern