From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 11:17:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E1623B for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5100A2E07 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id a1so5997899wgh.0 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:17:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=peamGtHSmxwSa48iWsjfG6rMXMmNaI2bykWclDP+XCc=; b=aLRGEM3mgxFNA0H7GlxAcKVulTj2nKyKvrpswnZSKP3F286DyDH1SqhkK8pODk0zI6 vFhYNLYdGQ/s2DjVNuPBQ9el7w+hg6O1OA4TPfm40mFS2zwopBG2lWQLYfFyWjP2H6i0 ITxBv3eJU219Ewp0gOP/GsIFlMWDHmL2LJeRdEqSthCTTQx3otXpy5PHWIsp2IXqrYUG Pqqsd1pOeQUnfL1sFq69fCNa7PH/9SjNKG8W9AX+773/qkFAQSAgpADGouZ3TdFB5OL1 GTKu8U0FYwBkrGBM8HGmoA37bqDrhZiG5EXSig4EMgFfcNu3KpJ1/QxV4TDGHhjYpORX pmxQ== X-Received: by 10.180.75.197 with SMTP id e5mr17728262wiw.76.1403954271409; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:17:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l5sm7062735wif.22.2014.06.28.04.17.50 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:17:48 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Harshavardhana Subject: Re: FreeBSD support being added to GlusterFS Message-ID: <20140628111748.GG34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <6ADBB2BF-C7E8-4050-9278-2565A63D2EA8@gluster.org> <20140627070411.GI24440@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140627223456.GD34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140628070433.GE34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140628071735.GF34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KR/qxknboQ7+Tpez" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jordan Hubbard X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:17:53 -0000 --KR/qxknboQ7+Tpez Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 04:07:38AM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote: > > it is not necessary on an official release which comprises of "./config= ure" . > > > > >=20 > In-fact argp from ports is okay to use, but it would be less work to > rely on argp-standalone > provided by GlusterFS. If the reason to use 'argp' from port was > related to ./autogen.sh - > then in-fact its not necessary. >=20 > As i explained earlier - it was our mistake to provide only 'git' > tarball not the 'make dist' tarball. > I have further changes pending on review upstream, once they are > pushed - i will provide a new > tarball - without the necessity for './autogen.sh' >=20 > Thanks for testing this port. Thank you in general we try to unbundle as much thing as possible that said= argp is small and safe enough to not cause problems having it bundled :) So I have no strong opinion on that. regards, Bapt --KR/qxknboQ7+Tpez Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOupFwACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyI9ACggjeMzeLR+hUxGgdTqK0GgYgi zU0AnjJJmIo/EyydZ3rMQCyikjY3UL6Q =m9JT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KR/qxknboQ7+Tpez--