From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Feb 9 18:29:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AD6AA3E74 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 897227C8 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u19ITm7W016197 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:29:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206934] MFC of commits r272695 and r288529 Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 18:29:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mgrooms@shrew.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 18:29:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206934 --- Comment #4 from mgrooms@shrew.net --- Thanks for the clarification regarding enc. I'm not trying to make more work for developers, I'm just trying to prevent other users from experiencing the same problems I have. Here is some background: While upgrading a pair of firewalls to 10, I went through a week of crashes= and scrambling to apply kernel patches from head ... https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014-October/040170.html Before upgrading to 10.2-RELEASE, I went through all patches I had previous= ly applied to see if they had been MFCd. Regardless, when I upgraded I still w= ent through two days of crashes and applying kernel patches from head ... https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mailing.freebsd.stable/8ZYiHDkarhU The other patch that fixed my 10.2 problem was MFCd with RE approval two da= ys ago ... https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206933 The only other patches that looked like they may not have MFCd were the two mentioned in this bugzilla ticket. After all the adventures I've had upgrad= ing 10.x firewalls, I felt I would be remiss if I didn't follow up with a reque= st. I appreciate all the work you and other developers do on FreeBSD. IMO, it's= the best alternative to proprietary firewall systems that support stateful fail-over. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=