From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 17 22:00:21 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1936FC;
 Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (mail-lb0-f180.google.com
 [209.85.217.180])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7858B8FC26;
 Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id gj3so57484lbb.39
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:00:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=rQuLQSymZGM5PcOht69XOMMWR9MVhjQszVn8U2T+Us8=;
 b=pRQpyhkeHY2X0CFC94pmRcNb5+ch5Ep2IEf/Ag1Jmxw4K+sNui22u/IzkmXOCspgMD
 MLLwcw1NVq4m8MH8c8ozeerhTtd3ezBk41Xyl0jlkRwu/dYnZf0sj80F+705N+1G+Qh/
 HN6YFZAsj5W7ygnGoKLIG3aqLDnNeDbso6/Hn1Ic582sktOCBpSqx7XckDfFo89Cr2XV
 tkqCPE+J0OIh75atWoTx/WCPf5nbRktSNiOSnLdUui6eWjQhw/xeEDbcsJ9/9Im5bY/z
 ShpM1JzWsRLIs5KGatagL12B1jqzhjyOBVw1Q+AIPJprK8m+gt/9437Jh1T+BIxHPL7q
 iDrQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.26.41 with SMTP id i9mr563lbg.77.1355781604139; Mon, 17
 Dec 2012 14:00:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.109.198 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:00:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1886761249.1455682.1355777126858.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212171743340.1564@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <1886761249.1455682.1355777126858.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:00:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CACpH0Me7KVFTUGE7S0PjPQ_+rpFEOd7t0r74ZyooZ2gVcd4Rsg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS.
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>
To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>,
 Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:00:21 -0000

Does windows 7 support nfs v4, then?  Is it expected (ie: is it worthwhile
trying) that nfsv4 would perform at a similar speed to iSCSI?  It would
seem that this at least requires active directory (or this user name
mapping ... which I remember being hard).