Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 11:25:26 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: gordont@gnf.org Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /rescue Message-ID: <20030508.112526.68226550.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20030508172326.GP76376@roark.gnf.org> References: <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org> <20030508.110858.91024289.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030508172326.GP76376@roark.gnf.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20030508172326.GP76376@roark.gnf.org>
Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> writes:
: On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:08:58AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org>
: > Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> writes:
: > : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:39:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > : >
: > : > Tim posted this a while ago to hackers@. It looked like it was
: > : > further along than what's been posted here.
: > :
: > : Actually, Tim's and my work are complimentary. I hadn't worked on
: > : getting a /rescue, /stand, /ohcrap directory. Personally, I agree
: > : with David O'Brien that it should be called /stand since we have
: > : precedence (and documentation in hier(7)) for that.
: >
: > NetBSD put them in /rescue. /stand has been phased out over the past
: > few years. There's precident many ways. Can we please not argue of
: > stupid shit like this? That's why we get into these damn bikesheds.
:
: Bikeshed? I wouldn't call it a bikeshed yet, and let's not get to that
: point if we can avoid it. If we want a clean break, so be it. I don't
: particularly care one way or the other. I just expressed my preference.
I guess the recent name hiding thread has gotten my bikeshed trigger
on 'hair' no.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030508.112526.68226550.imp>