From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 30 00:36:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B974016A408; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi@bonkers.video-collage.com) Received: from bonkers.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CB313C468; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi@bonkers.video-collage.com) Received: from bonkers.video-collage.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bonkers.video-collage.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3U0KY3a044402; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:20:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@bonkers.video-collage.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by bonkers.video-collage.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l3U0KXKT044401; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:20:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <200704300020.l3U0KXKT044401@bonkers.video-collage.com> To: rafan@FreeBSD.org (Rong-En Fan) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:20:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200704290809.l3T89I55001072@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on bonkers.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/71254: ncurses: xterm vs. cons* termtypes or sc(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:36:03 -0000 > Synopsis: ncurses: xterm vs. cons* termtypes or sc(4) > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: rafan > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 29 08:08:11 UTC 2007 > State-Changed-Why: > Dear submitter, > > Does this still occur in latest release, say 6.2-RELEASE > or in HEAD? Yes, it does still occur. Verifying it for itself is faster, than sending an e-mail with the question: inside an xterm bring up `vi' to edit a file with long lines. Triple-click on a long (one wrapping to the next line) line. Notice, that only part of the line gets highlighted by xterm. Opening the same file with less/more has the same effect. Cat-ing, however, does not -- presumably, because cat does not use [n]curses. Yours, -mi