From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 8 17:37: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8147E37B417 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 17:37:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with UUCP id fB91b0F65943; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 02:37:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely20.cicely.de [10.1.1.22]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fB91b0tx060211; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 02:37:00 +0100 (CET)?g (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from cicely8.cicely.de (cicely8.cicely.de [10.1.2.10]) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id fB91b0W02243; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 02:37:00 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely8.cicely.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fB91axP07106; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 02:36:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 02:36:59 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Peter Wemm Cc: Joerg Wunsch , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_diskmbr.c Message-ID: <20011209023659.A7042@cicely8.cicely.de> References: <200112082356.fB8NuII32772@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20011209010912.F405A39EC@overcee.netplex.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011209010912.F405A39EC@overcee.netplex.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely8.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:09:11PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > Joerg Wunsch wrote: > > Bernd Walter wrote: > > > > > 32 times for each disk on booting with most of 30 disks. > > > Possibly it's triggered by vinums drive scanning. > > > > Yep, same here (and it is triggered by vinum). > > > > > What can I do about these messages? > > > > Remove it. It should not have been there in the first place, at least > > not without an "if (bootverbose) ..." in front of it. It isn't > > telling any news anyway, because you certainly already knew that your > > disks are using DD mode, and the last word is telling "(ignored)" > > which is the intented and expected action to happen anyway. > > There shouldn't *be* bootblocks on non-boot disks. I usually have a /boot/loader.work and a /boot/kernel.work for updating. What is wrong about having spare bootblocks? In fact I already needed them twice and the diskspace is unused anyway. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message