From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 1 20:38:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5F216A40F for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from nxm.secservers.com (nxm.secservers.com [193.85.228.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E3043D78 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:37:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nxm.secservers.com. [193.85.228.22]) by nxm.secservers.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kA1Kb9JR074444; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:37:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: Gilberto Villani Brito In-Reply-To: <6e6841490611011141h5972ab8k87f35bb168e86164@mail.gmail.com> References: <65A313B6966.00000132falexsandro@inbox.com> <6e6841490611011141h5972ab8k87f35bb168e86164@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:37:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1162413420.1025.6.camel@genius.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PF/Altq X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:38:17 -0000 Gilberto Villani Brito wrote: > I don't know do that, so if you learn, please, send me a e-mail. > > Gilberto > > 2006/10/5, Flavio Silva : > > Hi People! > > > > I would like your help, in creating a rule to control the bandwidth for 200 hosts... > > i'm trying to set a limit to 64kbit/s for each host. > > There is any way to do this using altq without to had to create a queue for each host? I don't think there is with pf & altq but there is with ipfw (see man ipfw, section TRAFFIC SHAPER (DUMMYNET) CONFIGURATION, item mask). I had some issues with IPFW traffic shaping in the past though (it introduced large delays) but it was probably local configuration's specific problem. Michal