From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 10 00:07:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F7D106566B for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5082B8FC15 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6A07iOU059929; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:07:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id o6A07i0m059926; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:07:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:07:44 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Shaun Amott In-Reply-To: <20100709215656.GA23847@charon.picobyte.net> Message-ID: References: <4C374B3E.90704@bsdforen.de> <20100709172503.GA22795@charon.picobyte.net> <4C375E47.9020307@bsdforen.de> <20100709200016.GA23404@charon.picobyte.net> <4C378BB5.2080206@bsdforen.de> <20100709215656.GA23847@charon.picobyte.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.5 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:07:44 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Dominic Fandrey , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solutions for the PR load problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:07:49 -0000 On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Shaun Amott wrote: > Indeed, part of the problem is burn-out. We recruit committers, and then > their activity tapers off (I'm guilty of this myself). Part of this, I > believe, is down to the effort involved in maintaining a useful > (up-to-date) testing environment -- hence my advocacy of a centralised > tinderbox resource. The machines I used to use are out-of-date and > probably inadequate now. Isn't that the type of project the Foundation is set up to fund?