From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 17 12:49:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E554A37B400 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.datanet.hu (mx1.datanet.hu [194.149.13.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7E043E65 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:49:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) Received: from fonix.adamsfamily.xx (nilus-298.adsl.datanet.hu [195.56.49.44]) by mx1.datanet.hu (DataNet) with ESMTP id 85FF926A60A for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:49:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fonix.adamsfamily.xx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fonix.adamsfamily.xx (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6HJne0w015634 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:49:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) Received: (from cc@localhost) by fonix.adamsfamily.xx (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6HJne2S015633 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:49:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: fonix.adamsfamily.xx: cc set sender to sziszi@bsd.hu using -f Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:49:40 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Interesting panic very early in the boot Message-ID: <20020717194940.GC650@fonix.adamsfamily.xx> Mail-Followup-To: Szilveszter Adam , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3D3508A0.B7D12818@mindspring.com> <200207171657.MAA28965@glatton.cnchost.com> <20020717173822.GB1068@fonix.adamsfamily.xx> <3D35B8F7.9915A14D@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D35B8F7.9915A14D@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:35:35AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > My bet on the root cause, if I am correct, means that if you change > the amount of physical RAM installed in the machine, the problem will > go away, and that the problem is probably rare because it depends on > certain things that are more complicated, after Matt's changes after > my complaints about machdep.c reservations on large memory machines, > as the amount of physical RAM approaches the size of the address > space. 'Key, I can try that too. However, this machine is anything but "large memory" these days: it has 128 Megs of (non-DDR) SDRAM. (2x64) -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szombathely Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message