From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:07:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 3D7231065679; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:07:30 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20090918150730.GA18347@FreeBSD.org> References: <200909181453.n8IEr1xJ093865@svn.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909181453.n8IEr1xJ093865@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r197313 - head/release X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:07:30 -0000 On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:53:01PM +0000, Ken Smith wrote: > Author: kensmith > Date: Fri Sep 18 14:53:01 2009 > New Revision: 197313 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/197313 > > Log: > Have sparc64 join the separate livefs crowd. Including the docs packages > on disc1 (needed now by sysinstall) overflows the target CDROM iso size. I've always been wondering how could docs be more important than livefs? I'd rather have -docs iso (which I won't ever download anyways) than -livefs one (which is needed far more often, e.g. to fix botched or corrupted installation) in addition to disc1. ./danfe