Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:37:26 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: Dan Pelleg <peldan@yahoo.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/29902: Mozilla package URL problems Message-ID: <20010904133726.A30660@leviathan.inethouston.net> In-Reply-To: <15253.7337.16183.700473@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu> References: <3B93B283.10501@inethouston.net> <15252.56163.595166.767128@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu> <20010904111341.H99020@leviathan.inethouston.net> <15253.7337.16183.700473@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:25:45PM -0400, Dan Pelleg wrote: > > David W. Chapman Jr. writes: > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:47:15AM -0400, Dan Pelleg wrote: > > > David W. Chapman Jr. writes: > > > > None of the url's point to the package though, correct? > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure I understand the question. > > > > > You said there is no link to the package, there isn't a link to any > > port's "package" > > > > > > We're having a bad case of miscommunication here. Whatever I said, here is > what I meant: > > Look at http://www.freebsd.org/ports/www.html > > Many entries have a link named "Package" that HREFs to some .tgz file, > which is presumably the precompiled package for the same port. See, for > example, muttzilla-0.40, two entries below mozilla-0.9.3,1. > > Now, mozilla-0.9.3,1 (and other mozilla* entries) does not have that link. My point was that mozilla isn't the only one like this, so it isn't necessarily a bug with that, but I'm not sure what's going on wrong. The package appears to be created, so that's not the problem. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net> dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010904133726.A30660>