From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 5 8:13:55 2000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 5 08:13:53 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from clark.net (ffaxvawx5-2-114.cox.rr.com [24.163.105.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4A437B402 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:13:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from clark.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clark.net (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eB5GBDT56474; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:11:14 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200012051611.eB5GBDT56474@clark.net> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: roam@orbitel.bg Subject: Re: ports collection CVS tags broken In-Reply-To: Message from Peter Pentchev of "Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:48:47 +0200." <20001205134847.B2404@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 11:11:13 -0500 From: Mark Coletti Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:48:47 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 08:11:59PM -0500, Mark Coletti wrote: > > Doing a CVS update for the tags RELENG_4 and RELENG_4_1_1_RELEASE > > yields empty directories. > > > > Cheers! > As George Reid said, you are using the wrong tags. To be more specific, > here's a quote from /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile: > [...] > I'd say that was an explicit enough warning :P Except I was using anonymous CVS and NOT cvsUP. So that warning is irrelevent. Worse yet, I **RTFM**. **THAT IS WHAT'S BROKEN**. Specifically, I went here for the CVS repository and tag information: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/anoncvs.html Using those tags yeilds the pathological behaviour I first pointed out. Whoever maintains that page needs to: s/RELENG/RELEASE/g Harumph, Mark -- Mark Coletti | mailto:mcoletti@clark.net | http://www.clark.net/~mcoletti/ And God said, "Let there be light", and there was light. And everyone said, "Hey, cool! Do You do parties?". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message