From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  1 01:52:09 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C6EDF6
 for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  1 Apr 2014 01:52:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413EBFF3
 for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  1 Apr 2014 01:52:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s311q8Hw054360
 for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 01:52:08 GMT
 (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from bdrewery@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s311q84H054356
 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 01:52:08 GMT
 (envelope-from bdrewery)
Received: (qmail 33776 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2014 20:52:06 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.245?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.1.245)
 by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 31 Mar 2014 20:52:06 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Freebsd port security/gnutls3 problems
From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D167)
In-Reply-To: <201404010132.s311W93M031911@catnip.dyslexicfish.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:52:06 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <72DF67C3-9F38-4723-9255-8D2FEEF9CA99@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201404010132.s311W93M031911@catnip.dyslexicfish.net>
To: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@dyslexicfish.net>
Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@FreeBSD.org>,
 "jamie@catnip.dyslexicfish.net" <jamie@catnip.dyslexicfish.net>,
 "wg@FreeBSD.org" <wg@FreeBSD.org>, "novel@freebsd.org" <novel@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 01:52:09 -0000


> On Mar 31, 2014, at 20:32, Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@dyslexicfish.net> wro=
te:
>=20
> Hi. Many ports that require gnutls fail if security/gnutls3 and not
> security/gnutls are installed.
>=20
> ( E.G. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D186785 )
>=20
> Whilst seemingly gnutls and gnutls3 can co-exist, the ports
> that depend on gnutls being installed pass the lib dependency
> when seeing the gnutls3 install, so therefore don't pull in
> security/gnutls
>=20
> Then, the ports themselves fail to build as pkg-config looks
> for "gnutls" whilst only "gnutls3" exists.
>=20
> As far as I can see, the options are:
>=20
> 1) Make ports depend on a particular library revision,
>   so pulling in security/gnutls
>=20
> or:
>=20
> 2) Replace gnutls with gnutls3

We will be doing (2) soon.

>=20
> or:
>=20
> 3) Use a bit of bsd.port.Mk magic to handle this situation - so that
>   if only gnutls3 is installed, the port will build correctly
>   against it.

Perhaps we can fix it in the short term  too.

>=20
> I don't know the roadmap for depreciating gnutls2 but if it's a
> while yet, I'd guess option 3) is the best?
>=20
> Any thoughts?
>=20
> Cheers,
>        Jamie