From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 06:44:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5AE16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 06:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from par033x2.europe.ra.rockwell.com (raeurfw.ra.rockwell.com [195.61.102.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140B443D55 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 06:44:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mkes@ra.rockwell.com) Received: from ferda.cze.ra.rockwell.com ([10.70.136.59]) by par033x2.europe.ra.rockwell.com with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.7.3) id PAA02134 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:44:25 +0200 (METDST) Received: (qmail 3241 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2004 13:44:25 -0000 Received: from euczprgmkes1.cze.ra.rockwell.com (HELO ra.rockwell.com) ([10.70.137.156]) (envelope-sender ) SMTP for ; 9 Apr 2004 13:44:25 -0000 Message-ID: <4076A8C6.40704@ra.rockwell.com> Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:44:38 +0200 From: Miroslav Kes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: HP NetRaid performance problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:44:44 -0000 Hi, I have HP NetServer LH 3000 machine with the NetRAID controller ... the dmesg says: amr0: mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff irq 5 at device 3.1 on pci3 amr0: Firmware E.01.00, BIOS B.02.01, 32MB RAM There is 1 disk (system) alone (RAID 0) and 3 disks (data) configured as RAID 5 array. The problem is that the write performance is very poor - about 6 - 10 times slower than the read performance (with softupdates on). Any idea what can be wrong would be really welcome. Thanks Mira P.S. Unfortunately I'm currently loosing the battle with other (W2K based) servers in hearts of my users in the office. Just because o that problem.