From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 20:54:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4F8106564A for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.50.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACF68FC21 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1114B5C34; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:54:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:54:04 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: David DEMELIER Message-ID: <20100917205404.GA66620@atarininja.org> References: <4C93AA31.5080202@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: editors/vim installs to / X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:54:05 -0000 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:21:46PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: > 2010/9/17 jhell : > > > > After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not > > registering the files it installed already I found out that it is > > installing to / ~!!!!! ugh. > > > > Why is ${PREFIX} being used and not ${LOCALBASE} ??? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/150649 There's that PR which is probably related but it's a bit light on useful information. > > No, > > ${PREFIX} is the good variable to specify the installation directory, > of course if you set this the port will probably install its files in > the user-defined ${PREFIX}. > > I'm writing the rewrite of the port to update vim to 7.3 and with a > real OPTIONS framework and remove the stupid WITH_VIM_OPTIONS KNOB > that doesn't work. The problem is that David doesn't like clean things > and I think he won't commit it because it won't be enough complicated. While I agree that editors/vim could use the changes you're discussing, do you really think such a comment is needed? Attacks like that are not necessary. Let your code speak for itself. -- WXS