From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Jan 23 1:41:48 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32D337B401 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:41:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.tepkom.ru (mail.tepkom.ru [195.9.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E4043EB2 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:41:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wart@mojo.tepkom.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tepkom.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 0454B971D8 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:43:48 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mojo.tepkom.ru (mojo.tepkom.ru [195.9.10.30]) by mail.tepkom.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3F5971D6 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:43:47 +0300 (MSK) Received: from wart by mojo.tepkom.ru with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18bdsN-0005AW-00 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:42:23 +0300 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:42:23 +0300 From: Wartan Hachaturow To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xdm with sig 11 on startup Message-ID: <20030123094223.GA19857@mojo.tepkom.ru> References: <20030122093011.Y82149-100000@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net> <20030122192151.GA22818@limekiln.vcisp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030122192151.GA22818@limekiln.vcisp.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 07:21:51PM +0000, Trent Nelson wrote: > Does kdm rely on any xdmauth functionality? kdm doesn't work eith- > er, from the reports I've seen. > > I'm going to try your suggestion now. Tell us if it'll work :) I've got the same xdm core with fresh 5.0-RELEASE. -- Regards, Wartan. "Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message