From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 10 10:25:30 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11AA32B
 for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [8.8.178.135])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17288FC08;
 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9AAPUuU087293;
 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:25:30 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from bapt@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9AAPUEF087288;
 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:25:30 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to
 bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:25:27 +0200
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
Subject: Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk
Message-ID: <20121010102527.GB26497@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References: <20121010121850.039fb6d2@bsd64.grem.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121010121850.039fb6d2@bsd64.grem.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:25:31 -0000


--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:18:50PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> Hi
>=20
> I noticed that HAVE_GNOME doesn't work properly with
> bsd.ports.options.mk yet, so
>=20
> .include <bsd.port.options.mk>
> .if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=3D""
> # ...
> .endif
> .include <bsd.port.mk>
>=20
> won't work, while this
>=20
> .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
> .if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=3D""
> # ...
> .endif
> .include <bsd.port.post.mk>
>=20
> does.
>=20
> AFAIK bsd.port.pre.mk/bsd.port.post.mk should be replaced by
> bsd.port.options.mk/bsd.port.mk in the long term, so having this work
> or documenting a workaround would help port maintainers who are
> in the process of updating the port structure.
>=20
> Michael
>=20
> --=20
> Michael Gmelin
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Which ports are you speaking about? given that HAVE_GNOME:#gnomelibs is ref=
ering
to gnome 1.4 I think this part can safely be dropped out.

regards,
Bapt

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlB1TRcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwIagCZAWIHPfaRybwdNa+bXewmcKzA
yQ0AoIKNtIe7oeI2Qrk4D894S9qF09+l
=J+vi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--