From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 04:19:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B17116A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:19:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA87943D54 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:19:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 87356 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Mar 2004 12:19:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.4.1.17?) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 12:19:52 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:22:52 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long X-X-Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.home To: Alfred Perlstein In-Reply-To: <20040309114002.GN56622@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: <20040309052229.E63378@pooker.samsco.home> References: <20040309071912.GM56622@elvis.mu.org> <20040309010921.Y61788@pooker.samsco.home> <20040309114002.GN56622@elvis.mu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diagnosing interrupt storms? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:19:55 -0000 On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Scott Long [040309 00:08] wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > At a certain point after booting my SMP 5-current box gets all > > > weird, typically I see 50%+ time spent in interrupt. If I run "top > > > -S" I typically see one of the ithreads using 50% cpu. > > > > > > I'm trying to figure out what it's doing, what has gone wrong etc. > > > > > > Are there any sysctls to look at or things I can do to diagnose > > > this? > > > > > > (also I my laptop still can't boot with top-of-the-tree current) :( > > > > > > > A dmesg here would help, of course. You might have a similar problem as > > me, where the SMI interrupt is misconfigured as active-low instead of > > active-high, so it storms the system. Does disabling ACPI make a > > difference? Since it's SMP, does disabling APIC (and thus turning it into > > UP) make a difference? > > dmesg doesn't report anything out of the ordinary. > > I will try your suggestions the next time I get wedged. > > thank you, dmesg would show how the interrupts are assigned and routed. Scott