From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 25 17:45:40 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2E316B116
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 25 May 2006 17:45:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BC743DF1
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 25 May 2006 17:44:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.4])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1FjJsv-0008ZU-Ho; Thu, 25 May 2006 21:44:33 +0400
Message-ID: <4475ECF0.7020206@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 21:44:16 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060429)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
References: <0IZT00JC01ER7S50@VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca>
	<4475D60D.3070904@utdallas.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4475D60D.3070904@utdallas.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/95018 - Status report
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:45:55 -0000

Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Can anyone tell me the status of this PR?  Has any committer looked at it?
> 

There is no easy way to get the port from the PR. Sorry.

That's why we ask to send new ports packed with shar(1).

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.