Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 19:22:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220926] sysutils/linux-crashplan: Update to 4.8.3 Message-ID: <bug-220926-13-hC5GdR7GEO@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-220926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-220926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220926 Nuno Subtil <subtil@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback?(subtil |maintainer-feedback- |@gmail.com) | --- Comment #12 from Nuno Subtil <subtil@gmail.com> --- I get the same results that Dan reported with Richard's patch. It doesn't s= eem to be working correctly. I'm flagging this down for now. Dan's patch seems identical to the original one that I posted, modulo pkg-p= list changes. It builds and installs fine on my system as well. It seems like this boils down to issues applying that patch, which could be explained by the fact that I built it on the git tree (besides the DOS line endings --- sorry!). This causes the Makefile to not have the SVN version header, which unfortunately shows up in the diff and causes patch to reject those hunks. As a path forward, I'd suggest Richard to review the pkg-plist deltas betwe= en the two patches and suggest a course of action. It's not clear to me why etc/rc.d/crashplan should not be in pkg-plist --- is there some guidance on this? I'll wait a few days to get some feedback on this. If I don't hear back, I'= ll approve one of the existing patches to attempt once again to get some closu= re on updating this port. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220926-13-hC5GdR7GEO>